Waddell’s Signs

Waddell’s Signs

Waddell’s Signs

0

This is a very difficult topic.  It, however is an appropriate discussion,  considering we are in a national debate about healthcare and its costs.

As a physician,  sometimes we are asked to make judgements on the validity of a patients complaints, and compare them to the physical findings.  It can be an uncomfortable position for some physicians.  As the patient advocate,  the physician will give the patient the benefit of the doubt.  But,  if there are inconsistencies,  and yet a physician makes risky recommendations, despite  the inconsistencies,  the Physician may potentially be recommending a treatment or test that may cause more harm than good.

There are well known disease entities such as Munchausen Syndrome,  where a patient will subject themselves to aggressive and invasive treatments,  including surgery because of a non-physical or psychologic need.    A careful physical exam may identify findings that are not consistent with the reported conditions.  These so called Nonorganic Physical signs are important clues to identifying patients that may have underlying non-physical needs.

In 1979,   the Volvo Award in Clinical Science went to Dr. Gordon Waddell, for his research documented in the following article:

Nonorganic Physical Signs in Low Back Pain, by Waddell et al.

To summarize,  Dr. Waddell identified 5 characteristics of patients exhibiting Nonorganic Physical signs of Low Back Pain.

1. Tenderness.   Does not follow common patterns. To give an example, significant pain with even light touching of the skin. Or wide spread pain to large deep areas.

2. Distraction.   Examples include no pain with distracted provocative moves such as distracted straight leg raise.  Another example is observed normal range of motion or activity, but with testing, significant limitation of muscle strength or range of motion.

3. Simulation.   Pain patterns that do not fit a physical reason. Examples are significant pain with light compression on the skull, or pain with light twisting of the pelvis with patients without hip problems.

4. Regional inconsistencies. Examples of non-anatomic or inconsistent strength or sensation findings during an entire examination.

5. Over reaction.  Examples are severe pains with any movement, excessive gesturing to express pain. The air leak sign.

These 5 signs are now known as the Waddell’s Signs.

As a Physician,  I do not purposely look for these signs.  But,  as a spine specialist,  these signs are often easy to identify.  If I have suspicions of a non-physical cause of complaints,  I am more cautious to order invasive testing or treatment.  I am definitely less likely to offer surgical management unless I am convinced the findings and tests identify a life or limb threatening problem.  The workup and counseling can be very lengthy,  costly and at times,  seem adversarial.

For some patients,  they are just anxious, and over react.  But,  if they exhibit many of the signs above,  I would  counsel them on the oddity of their complaints,  and unfortunately,  it means more non invasive testing to make sure we are not missing an underlying more serious condition.  It can get costly for some entity to pay for all these tests.

It is not that the physician does not trust the patient.  It is that  the physician does not want to do more harm by recommending a more invasive, potentially harmful, and unneccesary treatments.    Unfortunately,  for all parties involved,  Patient,  Physician,  Family,  Work Place, Payor,  etc., the outcomes and relationships are often diminished during the evaluation for these Nonorganic physical findings.  As a physician,  we  have a responsibility to consider this possibility in some of our patients.  This scenario does not make the physician very popular.  It is a scenario that challenges physician professionalism. But,  it is consistent with our charge to do no harm.

Is it better to over treat than to under treat?  That question begets a subset of questions such as,  do the unintended consequences of the treatments cause more harm?  What is the less risky choice?  What are the costs associated with over treatment? Who will then bear the costs of the treatment?  Do the patient and family understand the ramification of the choice?  Are the treatments based on consistent physical findings,  or solely on complaints?   Physicians are asked to balance those questions,  as we counsel patients on the next step in their treatments.  Sometimes,  the choice is not obvious in the face of seemingly serious complaints.  But a Physician’s training, and experience often reflect an approach that at least considers the non-organic signs when making recommendations.

 

Citations

  • Paolucci T, Morone G, Iosa M, Fusco A, Alcuri R, Matano A, Bureca I, Saraceni VM, Paolucci S. Psychological features and outcomes of the Back School treatment in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. A randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Jun;48(2):245-53. PubMed PMID: 22095057

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Disclosure Statement

The information provided on this website does not provide or should be considered medical advice. It is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment of any condition. The information provided is for informational purposes only. You should not rely solely on the information provided on this website in making a decision to pursue a specific treatment or advice. You should consult directly with a professional healthcare provider.

As a condition of using the information on this website, ShimSpine and its physicians are not responsible for any advice, diagnosis, treatment or outcome you may obtain.

ShimSpine.com is completely self-funded. No outside funds are accepted or used. This website does not utilize paid advertising as a source of revenue.

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.

Author and Contributor to www.Spine-Health.com – July, 2015

www.Spine-Health.com/author/john-h-shim-md-facs

Chief of Surgery, Mease Countryside and Mease Dunedin Hospitals, Safety Harbor and Dunedin, Florida. 2014-2016.

Orthopaedic Section Chief Mease Countryside Hospital; Safety Harbor, Florida Mease Dunedin Hospital; Dunedin, Florida.2008-2013

Board Member Morton Plant Mease Research Council

Co-Director of Mease Neuro-Ortho Spine Center Mease Dunedin Hospital; Dunedin, Florida.

One of “6 Spine Physicians Ranked #1 on Google” – December 2016

Top Ten Most Liked Spine Surgeons on the Internet – July 2016

2016 Spine Surgeons to Know list – January 2016

2014 Spine Specialists to know list – September 2014

One of Ten Leaders of Certified Spine Programs – December 2011

 

The Best Orthopedics in Tampa

The information provided on this website does not provide or should be considered medical advice. It is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment of any condition. The information provided is for informational purposes only. You should not rely solely on the information provided on this website in making a decision to pursue a specific treatment or advice. You should consult directly with a professional healthcare provider.

As a condition of using the information on this website, ShimSpine and its physicians are not responsible for any advice, diagnosis, treatment or outcome you may obtain.

ShimSpine.com is completely self-funded. No outside funds are accepted or used. This website does not utilize paid advertising as a source of revenue.
Outpatient Spine Surgery Considerations. www.Spine-Health.com. January 2016.

What is Spinal Stenosis? www.Spine-Health.com. October 2015.

Surgeon insights on the Changing Landscape of Orthopedic Care. OrthopedicToday. June 2014

Chapter 33: Interspinous Spacers. Shim JH, Mazza JS, Kim DH Published in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Spinal Techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Published 2011)

Chapter 35: Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Lumbar Fusion Technique.Shim JH, Mazza JS, Kim DH Published in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Spinal Techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Published 2011)

March 2010 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting New Orleans, Louisiana February 2010

February 2010 A Review of Dynamic Stabilization in the Lumbar Spine Selby Spine Symposium; Park City, Utah

November 2009 Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Community Based Lecture; Tampa, Florida

September 2009 Instructor/Proctor Minimally Invasive Lumbar Cadaver Lab; Tampa, Florida

February 2009 New Spinal Technology: Cervical Disc Replacement and Interspinous Spacers. Selby Spine Symposium; Park City, Utah

February 2008 The Degenerative Spine: The Role of Dynamic Lumbar Stablization and Interspinous Spacers Selby Spine Symposium; Park City, Utah

October 2008 Emerging Technology and Techniques in Spinal Surgery Orthopaedics in the 21st Century Symposium; Morton Plant Mease Healthcare; Largo, Florida

September 2007 Emerging Technology in Spinal Surgery Orthopaedics in the 21st Century Symposium; Morton Plant Mease Healthcare; Largo, Florida

October 2006 Emerging Technology and Techniques in Spinal Surgery Orthopaedics in the 21st Century Symposium; Morton Plant Mease Healthcare; Largo, Florida

May 2005 The Role of Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures Mease Neurosciences Symposium; Clearwater, Florida
Please note all articles, blogs and Q&A’s on this site are general information and are not to be used as medical advice for individuals. No specific diagnosis or treatment should be made based on this information. Only a physician can provide you with advice specific to your situation. Please followup with your physician if you would like to discuss your individual condition.

If you are having a medical emergency,  contact your Doctor immediately,  or go to the Emergency Room.
ShimSpine and ShimSpine.com is committed to honoring and respecting the privacy and anonymity of the individuals using its website(s) and/or services. The purpose of this Privacy Policy is to inform the individuals about the collection, processing and protection of information done by ShimSpine what information we collect, why we collect this information and how we use this information.

This Privacy Policy will be reviewed regularly to reflect the up-to-date practices of ShimSpine.